Akpabio’s Call Appeared On Sandra Duru’s Livestream: Coincidence Or Coordination?

106

Akpabio’s Call Appeared On Sandra Duru’s Livestream: Coincidence Or Coordination?

By: Teddy Onyejuwe

When the gods want to disgrace a man, they first bless him with the arrogance to undo himself. It never begins with thunder. It starts with one careless moment of a missed call that tells the whole story. That was the day Sandra Duru, also known as “Prof. Mgbeke,” went live on Facebook to do a dirty job.

Her mission was clear: destroy Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan reputation with claims so wild they belonged in a badly written Nollywood script such as treason, conspiracy to murder and bribery. It was a production of manipulation disguised as concern. She raised her voice to the heavens, except that it wasn’t her voice that betrayed her, but her phone screen.

In the middle of her drama, while showcasing alleged chats with Natasha, her WhatsApp call log flashed for a split second.
And there it was… a missed call from “Senator Akpabio SP.” It didn’t happen before or after the show. It happened during the performance. At the very moment Sandra was vomiting her lies, the Senate President that Natasha accused of sexual harassment was calling her.

This is from the same Sandra who insisted she didn’t know any Akpabio or “SP” as in Senate President.
So what exactly was his name doing on her phone, calling her live during her performance?

Why would Nigeria’s Senate President be calling a woman mid-livestream while she was targeting the very woman accusing him of sexual harassment?
What sort of relationship exists for a sitting Senate President to be that comfortable making that call at that time she’s orchestrating what now looks like a digital assassination?
What explanation makes sense outside of coordination for such a calculated interruption?
Why would Sandra claim ignorance of Akpabio when her own call log proves a direct, active link?

The livestream that was meant to destroy Natasha became evidence in plain sight. It was a digital crime scene with the call log as the blood on the floor. The screen exposed what her lips tried to hide.
What we witnessed wasn’t mere coincidence. It was a political autopsy gone wrong and a digital bloodstain on a floor someone forgot to mop. It takes only one second of carelessness to unravel a well funded deception.

It doesn’t stop with Akpabio. Her phone also flashed other names:
“IGP Kayode,” “CSO Imo State,”
“Ned Nwoko.”
These are players with deep ties to political machinery and security architecture.
So, who is Sandra Duru? Is she a journalist, a security agent, a civil rights crusader? Or a political contractor used by men too weak to fight their battles in daylight?

Simply put… is she a politically convenient hitwoman for hire?

When power miscalculates, it’s never in the noise, but in the moment, arrogance forgets to cover its tracks. Watch that video again.

She wasn’t narrating a story. She was acting. Her eyes kept dropping. Her lines were too clean. She was reading from a script. Whoever handed her that script forgot to tell her to turn off notifications and erase the call history. That was the mistake.

The timing of that call destroyed every denial. It revealed a Senate President who, while denying involvement, seemed tied, even digitally, to the machinery built to clean his name and stain another’s.
That was where the truth slipped through the performance.

Was this livestream a desperate attempt to blur the facts, reverse the roles, and paint Senator Natasha as the villain in her own story?
Was this whole stunt a digital decoy to deflect attention and destroy credibility? The timing suggests so. The call log confirms suspicion. And the performance… oh, the performance, screams desperation.

Desperation to rewrite a scandal.
Desperation to weaponise falsehood against the one woman in the Senate who won’t bow.
Desperation to use an actress in place of accountability.

We are not saying Sandra was hired. We are only asking what every thinking Nigerian should be asking:
Who was calling her, and why? .

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here